<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Blogging Around &#8211; Fantasy Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riseoftherays.com/2010/02/just-blogging-around-fantasy-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riseoftherays.com/2010/02/just-blogging-around-fantasy-time/</link>
	<description>A Tampa Bay Rays Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Rogers</title>
		<link>http://riseoftherays.com/2010/02/just-blogging-around-fantasy-time/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riseoftherays.com/?p=2155#comment-919</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree. Crawford definitely does more than stolen bases. He consistently hits .300 and is usually good for around 20 homers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree. Crawford definitely does more than stolen bases. He consistently hits .300 and is usually good for around 20 homers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://riseoftherays.com/2010/02/just-blogging-around-fantasy-time/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riseoftherays.com/?p=2155#comment-917</guid>
		<description>Yes, fair point that Crawford is a far superior player - fantasy or otherwise - than Bourn.  Slight exaggeration from Grey.  To be fair, we have Crawford valued at $29 (20th overall) vs. Bourn at $1 (270th overall) on our rankings - http://razzball.com/2010-fantasy-baseball-rankings/2010-razzball-projected-point-shares-12-team-chone/

But Crawford as a 7th pick is still ridiculous given so much of his fantasy value is tied to SBs and if he dials it down to 30 b/c of a bad hammy, he&#039;s no more than a 5th round pick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, fair point that Crawford is a far superior player &#8211; fantasy or otherwise &#8211; than Bourn.  Slight exaggeration from Grey.  To be fair, we have Crawford valued at $29 (20th overall) vs. Bourn at $1 (270th overall) on our rankings &#8211; <a href="http://razzball.com/2010-fantasy-baseball-rankings/2010-razzball-projected-point-shares-12-team-chone/" rel="nofollow">http://razzball.com/2010-fantasy-baseball-rankings/2010-razzball-projected-point-shares-12-team-chone/</a></p>
<p>But Crawford as a 7th pick is still ridiculous given so much of his fantasy value is tied to SBs and if he dials it down to 30 b/c of a bad hammy, he&#8217;s no more than a 5th round pick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

